Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38783 (ALL)

SURYA MANI UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/4724/2025 · 2025-09-23

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 4724 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Deepak Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner claims that he was appointed against a short term vacancy in the year 1997. His claim for regularization was rejected on 21.11.2024. According to petitioner's counsel, the petitioner should be extended the benefit as per the Government Order dated 04.10.2024 issued in pursuance of judgment rendered by this Court in Writ-A No. 21492 of 2023 (Vinod Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. & Others) decided on 30.9.2024. 3. In view of the said fact, the order dated 21.11.2024 is hereby quashed. The matter is remitted to Regional Regularization Committee to accord fresh consideration to the claim of the petitioner keeping in mind the guidelines laid down in paragraph no. 149 of the judgment rendered in Vinod Kumar Srivastava (supra) as well as the Government Order dated 04.10.2024, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the committee. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R. K. Singh Kaosik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Surya Mani Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad