Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3878 (JK)

BHARAT CHOWDHARY v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY TO GOVT., EXCISE DEPARTMENT

WP(C)/1671/2021 · 2025-05-23

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- WP(C) No. 1671/2021 CM No. 6491/2021 Bharat Chowdhary …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (23.05.2025) 1. Nemo for the petitioner. 2. It seems that the pendency has rendered this matter infructuous and, therefore, this case is dismissed for non- prosecution reserving right in favour of the petitioner that, in case, if the petitioner would reckon that the writ cause was still surviving to him for pursuing the writ petition to its logical adjudication on merits then the petitioner would have the liberty to seek restoration of the present writ petition provided the restoration application is filed within a period of limitation. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 23.05.2025 Shivalee Serial No. 01 Shivalee Khajuria 2025.05.27 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document