BHARAT CHOWDHARY v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY TO GOVT., EXCISE DEPARTMENT
WP(C)/1671/2021 · 2025-05-23
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3878 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3878 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 1671/2021 CM No. 6491/2021
Bharat Chowdhary …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (23.05.2025)
1. Nemo for the petitioner.
2. It seems that the pendency has rendered this matter infructuous and, therefore, this case is dismissed for non- prosecution reserving right in favour of the petitioner that, in case, if the petitioner would reckon that the writ cause was still surviving to him for pursuing the writ petition to its logical adjudication on merits then the petitioner would have the liberty to seek restoration of the present writ petition provided the restoration application is filed within a period of limitation.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
23.05.2025
Shivalee
Serial No. 01 Shivalee Khajuria 2025.05.27 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document