COCP No.1177 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 BACHAN DASS Vs AJAY KUMAR, IAS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI for the respondent. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. On 04.03.2025, following order was passed by this Court: petitioner to claim interest @ 10% instead of 8%, while learned the petitioner contends that the certified copy of order dated (Annexure P Clerk learned counsel for respondent, while contending that certified copy of the Writ Court order was received on 04.02.201 on 25.02.2019 and thus, the petitioner was not entitled for interest @ 10%. entire original record pertaining to the case of petitioner on the of hea 2. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, original record has been produced. Upon p certified copy of the order passed respondents. 3. In such circumstances, no cause survives in the instant petition as regards the differential proportion of interest. The petition stands disposed of, however, the petitioner would be law. 4. Rule stands discharged. April 02, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2021 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1177 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: BACHAN DASS AJAY KUMAR, IAS & ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Ankit Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) On 04.03.2025, following order was passed by this Court: “The short dispute in the present petition remains about the petitioner to claim interest @ 10% instead of 8%, while learned the petitioner contends that the certified copy of order dated (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court was handed over Clerk-Baldev Singh within 2-3 days of the passing of order. However, the above fact has been disputed and denied by the learned counsel for respondent, while contending that certified copy of the Writ Court order was received on 04.02.201 25.02.2019 and thus, the petitioner was not entitled for interest @ 10%. In such circumstances, respondent No. 3 is requested to entire original record pertaining to the case of petitioner on the of hearing. List on 02.04.2025. To be shown in the Urgent List henceforth.” In pursuance of the aforesaid order, original record has been Upon perusal thereof, no document has been found about the factum that certified copy of the order passed by the Writ Court was ever served upon the In such circumstances, no cause survives in the instant petition as regards the differential proportion of interest. The petition stands disposed of, however, the petitioner would be at liberty to Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1177 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI On 04.03.2025, following order was passed by this Court:- the present petition remains about the rights of petitioner to claim interest @ 10% instead of 8%, while learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the certified copy of order dated 07.11.2019 1) passed by the Writ Court was handed over to the concerned 3 days of the passing of order. However, the above fact has been disputed and denied by the learned counsel for respondent, while contending that certified copy of the Writ Court order was received on 04.02.2019 and the payment was made 25.02.2019 and thus, the petitioner was not entitled for interest @ 10%. In such circumstances, respondent No. 3 is requested to produce the entire original record pertaining to the case of petitioner on the next date To be shown in the Urgent List henceforth.” In pursuance of the aforesaid order, original record has been erusal thereof, no document has been found about the factum that by the Writ Court was ever served upon the In such circumstances, no cause survives in the instant petition as regards the differential proportion of interest. The petition stands disposed of, avail appropriate remedies, as per (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 rights of counsel for 07.11.2019 concerned However, the above fact has been disputed and denied by the learned counsel for respondent, while contending that certified copy of the 9 and the payment was made 25.02.2019 and thus, the petitioner was not entitled for interest @ 10%. produce the next date In pursuance of the aforesaid order, original record has been erusal thereof, no document has been found about the factum that by the Writ Court was ever served upon the In such circumstances, no cause survives in the instant petition as regards the differential proportion of interest. The petition stands disposed of, avail appropriate remedies, as per MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.03 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment