Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38772 (AP)

Vasamsetti Gangadhara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/40472/2015 · 2025-07-01

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010767582015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 40472 Between: Vasamsetti Gangadhara Rao, The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 2. 3. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 40472 OF 2015 Vasamsetti Gangadhara Rao, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 40472 OF 2015 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in issuing impugned Notice in Roc.No.12285/2002-A18, dated 18.11.2015 on the name of Ruthala Padmavathi and Md. Rafi to vacate from Municipal Corporation Complex Shop Nos. 8, 9 and 10 at Gokavaram Bus Stand at the instance of Secretary, Mala Mahanadu on the ground that the Surya Chandra Wine Shop running near to Ambedkar Statue without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2015 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Sri Tata Singaiah Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, who appeared virtually submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 02.07.2025 KK