M/S. MV SHASIDHAR AND CO.,REP.BY MD., KAKINADA. v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.,REP.BY PRL.SECRETARY,ENERGY,HYD.,AND 4 OTRS.
WP/38720/2012 · 2025-07-27
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38770 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38770 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010762872012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 38720/2012 Between:
1. M/S. MV SHASIDHAR AND CO.,REP.BY MD., KAKINADA., REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, M GOWTHAM S/O GOPAL KRISHNA, AGE 42 YEARS, HINDU, D. NO 8-24-4B, SUBBARAO STREET GANDHI NAGAR KAKINADA 533004
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVT OF A P REP BY PRL SECRETARY ENERGY HYD AND 4 OTRS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD
2. THE SECRETARY, THE AP ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (APERC), SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. 3. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTREN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR , CORPORATE OFFICE, NEAR GURUDWARA, SEETHAMMADHARA, POSTAL COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM (PO). 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER APEPDCL, VIDYUT SAKHA BHAVAN, GODAVARI BUND, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
5. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, 0/O.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APEPDCL, VIDYUT SAKHA BHAVAN, GODAVARI BUND,
2
RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BS KARTIK & PRASAD ESR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 11954/P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL)
2. GP FOR ENERGY
3. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri BS Kartik & Prasad ESR, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. Kothapalli Aishwarya Chowdhary, learned Junior Standing Counsel representing Sri V.V. Sathish, learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL. 2. Ms. Kothapalli Aishwarya Chowdhary, learned Junior Standing Counsel for APEPDCL has placed reliance on the Common Order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.34450 of 2012 and batch dated
09.12.2024. Learned Junior Standing Counsel would submit that insofar as the first quarter for the Financial Year 2010-2011, the matter is subjudice before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The learned Junior Standing Counsel would submit that in respect of other periods, the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd., vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission &Ors: (2016) 9 SCC 134 governs the field and therefore, for such of the periods, the Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has already been implemented. 3.
Learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.34450 of 2012 and batch had taken note of the pendency of the Special Leave Petitions before the
3
Hon’ble Supreme Court insofar as the first quarter of the financial year 2010- 2011 is concerned and had issued the following directions: (1) The orders dated 20.09.2012 of the Commission pertaining to the FSA for the 1st quarter of the financial year 2010-2011 shall not be enforced on any of the consumers of the four DISCOMs, till disposal of the SLPs pending before the Supreme Court. (2) The enforceability or otherwise of the orders of the commissions for the 1st quarter of the financial year 2010-2011 shall depend on the result of the SLPs. (3) In the event of the Supreme Court confirms the judgment of the Division Bench dated 20.09.2012, the FSA for the 1st quarter of the financial year 2010-2011 will become unenforceable. In a converse situation, the petitioners shall be entitled to question the orders of the Commission in respect of both the financial years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. (4) If any of the DISCOMs have collected the FSA for the first quarter of the financial year 2010–2011 from any consumers, including the petitioners, they shall adjust the same in the future electricity bills immediately falling due. This adjustment shall also be subject to the outcome of the SLPs pending before the Supreme Court.”
4.
Learned Counsel for both sides have no objection for the disposal of present Writ Petition basing on the above directions of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.34450 of 2012 and batch dated 09.12.2024.
5. In this view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the above extract in W.P.No.34450 of 2012 and batch dated
09.12.2024. No Order as to Costs.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 28.07.2025 DSV
4
137
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 38720/2012
28.07.2025
DSV
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 38720/2012 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE
ORDER Office Note
03. 28.07.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV
6