5}H % IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRU TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 17504 OF 2014 Between: Smt. Vegesna Rama Sitha, W/o Penumatsa Sitharamaraju, Hindu, aged about 57 years, R/o D.No.1-5/ 1-1, 35th Ward, Suryanarayanapuram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of AP. rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. Bhimavaram Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Bhimavaram. 3. Pasupuleti Murali West Godavari, S/o Nageswara Rao aged 43 years. Ward No.35, Suryanarayanapuram, Business, R/o Dr. No. 1-5-5, Bhimavaram - 534 202. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to give effect to the conformatory notice issued through proceedings bearing No.UC/BA.No.41/2007/B.O.No.ll, dated 26.03.2007 by demolishing the illegal constructions made by the respondent No.3 at the property in R.S.No.70/ 1 and 71 (nearest Door No.1-5-5), 35th Suryanarayanapuram of Bhimavaram Municipality, declaring its inaction as Ward, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of the provisions of the A.P.Municipalities Act and the Rules framed thereunder. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 21905 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to prevent the respondent No.3 not to make any constructions at the property R.S.No.70/ 1 and 71 (nearest Door No.1-5-5), 35th Ward, Suryanarayanapuram of Bhimavaram Municipality, pending final disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS. T V N BHUVANA RUKMINI REPRESENTING SRI V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent N0.2: SMT. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for the Respondent N0.3: SRI N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010769172014 v- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 17504/2014 Between; Smt. Vegesna Rama Sitha ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap Rep Byits PrI Secreatry And 2 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VSRANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent{S); I.Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 2.N ASHWANI KUMAR 3.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Ms.T.V.N.Bhuvana Rukmini, learned counsel representing Mr.V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed this Court that the cause in the present petition does not survive and requested to dismiss the same as infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT) registrar Officer //TRUE COPY// SEi To, 1. One CC to Sri V S R Anjaneyalu Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Standing Counsel For Municipalities Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri N Ashwani Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Muncipal Admn and Urban Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies TF & HIGH COURT DATED:05/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.17504 of 2014 5 17 MAR 2025 | Current Section . DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS