IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 276-2 DR. S.N. MANIKANDAN STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE M Present : Mr. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, D.A.G., Haryana Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2 KIRTI SINGH Learned counsel for the petitioner does not present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, direction is issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 31.07.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: DR. S.N. MANIKANDAN Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, D.A.G., Haryana Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner does not present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, direction is issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (KIRTI Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.16734 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.07.2025 …. Petitioner Versus …. Respondents KIRTI SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, direction is issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. KIRTI SINGH ) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No want to press the However, direction is issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial Jyoti 2025.08.06 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document