Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38761 (CAL)

SAMED ALI KHAN AND ORS v. LAL CHAND KHAN AND ORS

FAT/402/2025 · 2025-09-17

Acting, Apurba Sinha Ray, Soumen Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.09.2025 SL No.26 Court No.1 (gc) FAT 402 of 2025 CAN 1 of 2025 Samed Ali Khan & Ors. Vs. Lal Chand Khan & Ors. 1. In view of Section 21(1)(a) of the Bengal, Agra and Assam, Civil Court (W.B. Amendment) Act, 2000, this appeal is not maintainable in this Court. 2. Accordingly, the appeal and the application stand dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 3. However, this order shall not prevent the appellants to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 4. In the event the appeal is presented before the appropriate forum within a period of three weeks from date, the appellants shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 5. The certified copy of the impugned judgment shall be returned to the learned Advocate-on- record for the appellants in order to enable the appellants to present the appeal before the appropriate Court or forum. 6. The department shall retain photocopy of the said judgment in record. [Soumen Sen, C.J. (Acting)] (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)