IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESEN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO; 10873 OF 2015 Between: M.Rama krishna Das, s/o.Venkanna, aged about years, Pangidigudem village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari district. State of Andhra Pradesh, (original connection in name of Bollu Lakshmi Suseela) ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd., rep.by its Chairman and MD., Visakhapatnam. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL., Vidyut Bhavan, R.R.Pet, Eluru. The Divisional Engineer,. Operation, APEPDCL., Vidyut Bhavan, R.R.Pet, Eluru. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL., Bhimadole, West Godavari dist. B.Lakshmi Suseela, w/o.Veera raghavaiah Chowdhy, Aged about 56 years, 25-11-20/4, N.R.Pet, Eluru, West Godavari district 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the Lr.No.ADE/OSD/BMDL/S.A/D.No.314/15, dt.31.3.2015,consequenti al disconnection to petitioner agricultural service connection No. 152, 586 in category V of Pangidigudem village of Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, at the instance of the 5th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, void and consequently setaside. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 14361 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restore power supply to the petitioner agricultural service connection Nos. 152, 586 in category V of Pangidigudem village of Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. M RAVINDRA SRI. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) SRI. PILLIX LAW FIRM The Court made the following ORDER: r N APHC010765722015 5^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10873/2015 Bettiaen: M.rama Krishna Das, ...PETITIONER AND The Eastern Power Distribution Company Of A P Ltd and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .G CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2.PILLIX LAW FIRM 3 M RAVINDRA The Court made the following order: Impugning the proceedings issued by respondent Lr.No.ADE/OSD/BMDL/S.A./D.No.314/15, No.4 vide dated consequential disconnection of power to the petitioner’s service connection Nos. 152, 586, in category V of Pangidigudem village, Cwaraka Tirumala Mandal, the above writ petition is filed. 31.03.2015 and An Interim order was passed on 16.04.2015 directing the respondents to restore power supply to the petitioner’s service connection. SRS,J W..No.10873 of 2015 jhereafter, the writ petition was admitted on 04.06.2015. The matter underwent adjournments from time to time. When the writ petition is listed on representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be '^sted today, under the caption, for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 01.05.2025, there was no learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that, in Ms. Aishwarya of the interim order, power was restored to the petitioner’s subject pursuance service connection. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Wl. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT R^STRAR SECTION OFFICER ■, O..CCB SRI G CHANDRA 6TOH»i; «AO «—lO™a f r.g i:IS:?»TaSs'So^s&™. .orw 4. One CC to SRI. PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies. //TRUE COPY// To psk HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 ORDER ^01 AUG 2025 1^ WP.No.10873 of 2015 Co 3- itS» * £SeAI£ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION