P.Venkateswarlu, S/o. P.Ramaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/4879/2016 · 2025-02-04
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38760 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38760 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010766322016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4879/2016 Between: P.venkateswarlu, S/o. P.ramaiah and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K G RAVIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
2. ANITHA MESA (SC
3. UMA SHANKAR LOKANADHAM(SC FOR APRSEI)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4879/2016 P.venkateswarlu, S/o. P.ramaiah and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) UMA SHANKAR LOKANADHAM(SC FOR APRSEI) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S)
2 HBKM,J
W.P.No.4879 of 2016
The Court made the following Order:
On 19.12.2024, 26.12.2024, 07.01.2025 and 28.01.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Today also, in spite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners.
2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
04.02.2025 MDP