Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3876 (GAU)

Sh. Basgo Muni Chakma and 4 Ors. v. The Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) and 6 Ors.

WP(C)/144/2025 · 2026-08-31

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030007912025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/144/2025 Sh. Basgo Muni Chakma and 4 Ors. S/o Ratna Kumar Chakma R/o Tuikhurlui Village, Lawngtlai District, Mizoram 2: Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/o Nilo Kumar R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 3: Sh. Kanjan Kumar S/o Berosen Chakma R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 4: Sh. Lokhi Ranjan S/o Pawdawn R/o TuikhurluiVillage Lawngtlai District Mizoram 5: Smt. Ranjan Devi D/o Sundor Muni Chakma R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizora VERSUS The Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) and 6 Ors. r/b The Chief Executive Member, Lawngtlai, Mizoram 2:The Executive Member Page No.# 2/3 i/c LAD Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) Lawngtlai Mizoram 3:The Local Administrative Officer Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC) Lawngtlai Mizoram 4:Sh. Santosh Kumar S/o Kine Chandro R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 5:Sh. Banu Ranjan S/o Kejori Ranjan R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 6:Sh. Judha Muni S/o Deva Mohan R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizoram 7:Sh. Santi Bihari S/o Indrosen R/o Tuikhurlui Village Lawngtlai District Mizora Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. R. Lalhmunsiama for R1-3 Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 01.09.2026 Heard Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. None appears for the respondents on call. Mr. Lalpianfela Chawngthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, seeks that the matter may be disposed of. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant