(MAC No.1332/2022) 2025:CGHC:39185 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1332 of 2022 Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Through its Legal Manager, 4th Floor Maruti Heights, Beside Sky Auto Maruti Dealer, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur, Pin 492010, Chhattisgarh (Non-applicant) ... Appellant versus 1. Subhash Das, S/o Late Kamallochan Das, aged 45 years, Occupation Owner of Maharaj Dhaba, Barbaspur, R/o Village Barbaspur, Police Station & Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant) 2. Pradeepram Rao Pandey, S/o Ramrao Pandey, aged 32 years, R/o Dahegaon Rangari, Police Station Khaparkheda, District Nagpur (Maharashtra) (Driver) 3. Mohammad Rafiq, S/o Mohammad Habib, aged 32 years, R/o Qr. No.65, Bazar Line Ward No.06, Rohna Warli Khadar (Warli Colony), Tahsil Saoner, District Nagpur (M.H.) (Owner) ... Respondents For Appellant : Ms. Harneet Kaur, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Jyoti Kaushik, Advocate. Single Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06/08/2025 SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2025.08.07 18:00:58 +0530 (MAC No.1332/2022) 1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is directed against the award dated 5-8-2022 passed by the 1st Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Saraipali, District Mahasamund in Claim Case No.26/2020, by which a compensation of 8,61,500/- has been awarded ₹ to the claimant / respondent No.1 herein along with 9% interest per annum from the date of making the claim application fastening liability upon the appellant Insurance Company for the third party property damage. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant Insurance Company would submit that details of the articles which have been broken has not been given except the super structure building/ hotel. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/claimant would oppose the appeal and support the impugned award. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered their rival submissions made herein-above and also went through the record with utmost circumspection. 5. The Claims Tribunal upon appreciation of oral and documentary evidence available on record, came to the conclusion that the claimant has suffered damage to the extent of 8,61,500/- which in my considered opinion is ₹ the correct finding of fact based on the evidence available on record. I do not find any merit in this appeal, it deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Soma