Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3875 (PAT)

BOBBY DEOL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

CR. MISC./89330/2025 · 2026-02-24

Partha Sarthy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89330 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1. BOBBY DEOL KUMAR S/O LATE GORAKH RAM 2. CHHOTU KUMAR S/O SUNIL MISHRA Both are R/O VILLAGE- GANGAPUR, P.S.- DHANSOI, DIST.- BUXAR. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 3 24-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dhansoi P.S. Case no.145 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on search being conducted, it is stated that while two country made pistols and three live cartridges were recovered from the possession of petitioner no.1, one revolver was recovered from the possession of petitioner no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession who have been falsely implicated in the case. They Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89330 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 are in custody since 25.10.2025 and have no criminal antecedent. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation of recovery of country made pistols and revolver from the possession of the two petitioners along with three live cartridges, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and the application is rejected. 7. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after six months. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T