Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38743 (RAJ)

JAGDISH KUMAR VERMA S/O SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11694/2024 · 2025-11-06

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44541] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11694/2024 Jagdish Kumar Verma S/o Shri Mahavir Prasad Verma, R/o 107, Arya Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur At Present R/o Nawalgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12014/2024 Ashok Pareek S/o Late Shri Brajlal Pareek, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 20-A, Vikas Nagar Extension, Murlipura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan Mr. Mahaveer Kalwa For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Anil K. Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 06/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 141/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar, Jaipur District Jaipur City (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that civil proceeding were pending in which a cheque of Rs. 1.50 [2025:RJ-JP:44541] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11694/2024] crore was given in execution proceedings. It is further submitted that the primary allegation of the complainant is that cheque which was dishonored was of a non-existent bank "OBC". Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide an order dated 05.02.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant, subject to joining the investigation at the concerned police station. In compliance of the aforesaid, the applicant has duly joined the investigation. It is further submitted that the matter is purely civil in nature. It is further submitted that co- accused is one of the witness. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicant has already joined the investigation, as directed vide an interim order dated 05.02.2025; that the matter is purely civil in nature and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 05.02.2025 absolute and allow the instant anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sadar, Jaipur District Jaipur City (West) in F.I.R. No. 141/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Jagdish Kumar Verma S/o Shri Mahavir Prasad Verma & Ashok Pareek S/o Late Shri Brajlal Pareek shall be released on bail, provided they [2025:RJ-JP:44541] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11694/2024] furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/249-250