APHC010762942013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0K?4: TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST S TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 445 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dt 6.2.2013 in WP.No. 17698 of 2009 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. M. Lurdu Raju, S/o. Muthu, Aged 48 years, Christian, Driver R/o. 42-6- 65,Deba Kotlu Center Ajit Singh Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna 2. K. Nageswara Rao, S/o.Balakotaiah Railway Employee R/o.42-7-7/1, Daba Kotlu Center, Ajit Sing Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District 3. Rabiya Bi, W/o. Abdul Sattar Housewife R/o.42-7-9,Daba Kotlu Center Ajit Sing Nagar, Vijayawada,Krishna District District ...Petitioners AND 1. The Commissioner of Probation and Excise, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of Prohibition Excise, Vijayawada 3. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada, Vijayawada 4. K Rama Rao, S/o Atchaiah, Aged 55 Srinivasda Restaurant & Bar Door No.42-7-7 Singh Nagar, Vijayawada-15, Krishna District years. Proprietor of M/s.Sai Daba Kotlu Center Ajit ...Respondents 0 Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI B V S SIVARAMA PRASAD ( NONE APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI A S C BOSE SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI K RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following order: r 6 APHC010762942013 Bench Sr.No:-6 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SktJ: WRIT APPEAL NO; 445 of 2013 M. Lurdu Raju. and others ...Appellants Vs. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellants Advocate for Respondents None Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise CORAM ;THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 5th August 2025 P C : None for the appellants. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY^^ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. B V S Sivarama Prasad Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. A S C Bose SC for Municipal Corporation [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. K Rathanga Pani Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies GSC ¥ HIGH COURT DATED;05/08/2025 ORDER WA NO. 445 OF 2013 2 2 AUG 2025 ^s^^rcnt Sectioj^ity/ Co O c5? DISMISSING THE WA FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS