HARU ALIAS HARADHAN KARAMKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./645/2025 · 2025-01-28
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3874 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3874 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 645 of 2025 Haru @ Haradhan Karamkar aged about 47 years son of Manik Karamkar, resident of village- Gaychhanda, P.O.- Gangjori, P.S.- Jaridih, District-Bokaro. … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
----- For the Petitioner: M/s. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : M/s. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P --- 02/28.01.2025 Heard the Parties. Petitioner has been made an accused in connection with S.T. case no. 168 of 2021, arising out of Jaridih P.S. Case no. 08 of 2021, Corresponding to G.R. Case no. 60 of 2021, registered under sections 302, 323, 325, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, F.T.C., Bermo at Tenughat. Bail application of the petitioner has been earlier rejected twice by co-ordinate bench of this court. Petitioner alongwith co-accused persons had committed murder of the mother of informant. It appears that the murder weapon was recovered on the basis of confession of this petitioner. Learned lawyer for the petitioner submitted that the daughter of the informant has been examined during the trial and she has not supported the prosecution case. It was further submitted that the murder weapon was sent for forensic examination but the forensic report is yet to be received.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of the case and considering the nature of allegation; I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh uploaded