[2025:RJ-JP:45908] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17368/2025 Ramkaran Yadav S/o Shri Rampratap Yadav, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Panchayat Manda Bhinda, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. The Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector (Supply), Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 4. The District Supply Officer-Ii, District Supply Office, Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Subhash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav & Mr. Dewash Bajoria for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 14/11/2025 1. The present petition pertains to allotment of fair price shop. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorized by him. 2. Learned counsel Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.G.C. has taken a preliminary objection that the matter primarily pertains to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioner herein can be heard [2025:RJ-JP:45908] (2 of 2) [CW-17368/2025] within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioner, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction that the petitioner or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector as per the recommendation of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Committee (more specifically in para-19 of the said report) on 21.11.2025 at and around 11:00 A.M. and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed site will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. The present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI /37