Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38735 (PNJ)

BALBIR SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRM-M/34760/2018 · 2025-03-25

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

256 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 34760-2018 Date of Decision:- 25.03.2025 Balbir Singh and Anr. ....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and Anr. ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- None for petitioner. Ms. Nidhi Garg, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.2. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. 1. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.297 dated 15.09.2016 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 323, 498-A, 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of settlement agreement (Annexure P-2). 2. Today nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioners as well as on behalf of respondent No.2. Even earlier, nobody had appeared on behalf of petitioners as well as on behalf of respondent No.2 and the case was adjourned for today. Learned counsel for petitioners as well as respondent No.2 were notified about next date of hearing, even then nobody has turned up. 3. Today, learned counsel representing State pointed out that in FIR No.297 dated 15.09.2016 (supra) all the accused have been acquitted Sunil Devi 2025.03.26 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 34760-2018 -2- on 10.11.2020 by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Karnal. 4. In the light of this, present petition seeking quashing of aforesaid FIR has rendered infructuous and accordingly disposed of. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 25.03.2025 sunil devi Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sunil Devi 2025.03.26 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document