[2025:RJ-JP:47232] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 14932/2025 Raju Mandiwal S/o Gheesaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Raghunathpura, Police Station Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Mahala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. The present 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Raju Mandiwal S/o Gheesaram seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.325/2025 dated 29.07.2025 registered at P.S. Gudha District - Jhunjhunu, for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 308(2), 119(1), 352, 351(2) and 324(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:47232] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14932/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the present petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 24.09.2025 and now a charge-sheet has been filed. He further submit that this Hon’ble Court has granted bail to Rohit Bhakar @ Joni and Suraj Kumar and case of the preset petitioner is in parity with Rohit Bhakar @ Joni and Suraj Kumar. He further submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate First Class and trial will take time. He also submits that there is no evidence of involvement of the present petitioner in any gang. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. First bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 24.09.2025 but we have allowed the bail applications of Rohit Bhakar @ Joni and Suraj Kumar. 7. The material on record indicate that complainant Amrendra Singh has lodged a written report on 29.07.2025 about incident of 28.07.2025, at PS Gudha, District Jhunjhunu for assault, intimidation, extortion and use of criminal force by three named accused led by present petitioner. After investigation, the police has filed a charge-sheet against Raju Mandiwal, Rohit @ Jony Bhakar, Arvind and Suraj [2025:RJ-JP:47232] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14932/2025] Kumar. The investigation suggest that the present petitioner is a habitual criminal and he regularly indulged in criminal activities. The police report indicate that three criminal cases registered against the petitioner and out of which two relate to SC/ST (POA) Act. 8. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. 9. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 10. Accordingly, the 2nd application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Raju Mandiwal S/o Gheesaram is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/9