[2025:RJ-JP:42265] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15688/2025 Manoj Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Moolchand Yadav, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of 613, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Director, Non Gazetted, Medical And Health Services And Additional Director, Administration, Panchayat Raj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or directions, the impugned orders dated 24.12.2024 and 29.8.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. That the respondents may further be directed the respondents that due to peculiar circumstances of the petitioner, consider the representation of the petitioner and post him at Jaipur on nearby place against any of the vacant posts mentioned in the representation with regular salary and all benefits. That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in favour of the petitioner may also be awarded to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:42265] (2 of 2) [CW-15688/2025] That the cost of the writ petition may also kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the son of petitioner is suffering from neurological disorder and ideal place of treatment is Jaipur but without considering the circumstances attached with petitioner, he was transferred. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/49