.Boya Hanumanthappe v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/36175/2018 · 2025-07-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38729 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38729 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010750702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36175 OF 2018 Between:
1. Boya Hanumanthappa, S/o. Late Ramappa, Hindu, Aged about 67 Years, Resident of Kolimipalyam village, H/o. Jambagumpula, Kundirpi Mandal, AnantapurDistrict. 2. Boya Obanna, S/o. Late Ramappa, Hindu, Aged about 60 Years, Resident of Kolimipalyun village, H/o. Jambagumpula,Kundirpi Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. Boya Buthappa, S/o. Late Ramappa, Hindu, Aged about 52 Years, Resident of Kolimipalyem village, H/o. Jambagumpula,Kundirpi Mandal, Anantapur district. ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Rep by its Principle Secretary, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kalyandurg Circle, Kalyandurg Mandal, Anantapur District. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kundirpi Police Station, Kundirpi Mandal,, Anantapuramu District. 4. Boya Rama Murthy, S/o. B.tlarasimhappa, S/o. Late Ramappa, Hindu, Aged Jambagumpula, H/o. about 67 Years, Resident of Kolimipalyam village, Kundirpi Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ more particularly issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 interfering the petitioners land in SY.NO.37-1 extent of Ac 5.23 Cents, out of extent of Ac 10.67, cents in Jambugumpula Village Kundiripi Mandal, Ananthapur District, at the behest of the respondent no.4 and threatened the petitioner not enter the petitioners land is illegal un just without Jurisdiction is interfering the civil disputes. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim direction directing the respondents 2 & 3, not to interfere the petitioners land in Sy. No.37-1 extent of AC.5.23 Cents out of extent of Ac.10.67 cents in Jambugumpula Village, Kundiripi Mandal, Ananthapur District, pending disposal fo the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner Nos.1 & 2 : SRI K. RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Petitioner No.3 : Ms.
KOTHAPALLI AISHWARYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI V. FAROOK, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI SESHADRI GOALLA The Court made the following order:
f APHC010750702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36175/2018 Between: 1..BOYA HANUMANTHAPPE, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, HINDU,AGED RESIDENT OF KOLIMIPALYAM VILLAGE, ABOUT 67 YEARS H/OJAMBAGUMPULA,KUNDIRPI MANUAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2.BOYA OBANNA, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, HINDU,AGED ABOUT 60 RESIDENT OF KOLIMIPALYUN VILLAGE, H/0 YEARS JAMBAGUMPULA,KUNDIRPI MANUAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3.BOYA BUTHAPPA, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, HINDU,AGED ABOUT 52 RESIDENT OF KOLIMIPALYEM VILLAGE, H/0 YEARS, JAMBAGUMPULA,KUNDIRPI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONERS(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, REP BY VELAGAPUDI, ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALYANDURG CIRCLE,KALYANDURG MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, 3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDIRPI POLICE STATION, KUNDIRPI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 4.BOYA RAMA MURTHY, S/O B.TLARASIMHAPPA, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, HINDU,AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, KOLIMIPALYAM VILLAGE, RESIDENT OF H/0 JAMBAGUMPULA,KUNDIRPI
2 MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue anyappropriate writ more particularly issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2and 3 interfering the petitionerss land in SY.NO.37-1 extent of Ac 5.23 Cents, out of extent of Ac 10.67, cents in Jambugumpuia Village Kundiripi Mandal, Ananthapur District, at the behest of the respondent no.4 and threatened the petitioners not enter the petitionerss land is illegal un just without Jurisdiction is interfering the civil disputes, and pass lANO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioners(S):
1.KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY 2.KOTHAPALLI AISHWARYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.SESHADRI GOALLA
3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36175/2018 The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer; ...to issue anyappropriate writ more particularly issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2and 3 interfering the petitionerss land in SY.NO.37-1 extent of Ac 5.23 Cents, out of extent of Ac 10.67, cents in Jambugumpula Village Kundiripi Mandal, Ananthapur District, at the behest of the respondent no.4 and threatened the petitioners not enter the petitionerss land is illegal un just without Jurisdiction is interfering the civil disputes, and pass....” t;
2. Heard Sri K.Ram Mohan Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitionerss and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitionerss would submit that a civil suit in O.S.No.120 of 2018, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurgam Ananthapur District, is pending between the petitioners and the respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that at the instance of the respondent No.4, the police are threatening the petitioners not to enter the land. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that police are not
4. interfering in the civil dispute and no criminal case is registered against the petitioners and the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4
Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 would also submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the police not to interfere in the civil disputes, since the civil suit is pending between the petitioners and the respondent No.4. There shall be
order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
5.
6. no closed.
//TRUE COPY// SD/- G. KELA NAIDU ^ assistant RR^TRar : SECTIO^OFFICER To,
1. The Principle Secretary, state of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2. The Circle Inspector of Police Anantapur District.
3. The Sub Inspector of Police Anantapuramu District. 4 One CC to Sri K. Ram Mohan Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] f. One CC to Sri Kothapalli Aishwarya Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] wo CCS to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh (OUT) -?». One CC to Sn Seshadri Goalla, Advocate [OPUC]
8. Two CD Copies Home Department, Kalyandurg Circle, Kalyandurg Mandal, Kundirpi Police Station Kundirpi Mandal Cnr
HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 36175 OF 2018 15 0! SEP 2125 rr^ *2:^ . Current Seciion .
DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS