Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79583 Court No. - 70 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12597 of 2025 Applicant :- Qadir Ansari N@ Saaddam Husain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Digambar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. 1. Heard Mr. Digambar Dwivedi, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite party-1. 2. Perused the record. 3. Applicant-Qadir Ansari N@ Saaddam Husain, who is a charge sheeted accused and has been summoned by Court below, has approached this Court by means of present application under Section 528 BNS with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash the charge sheet dated 02-04-2023 alongwith cognizance/summoning order dated 05-01- 2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case no. 247 of 2024 (State versus Qadir Ansari @ Saddam Husain), arising out of Case Crime no. 57/2023, under Section 376, 328, 354, 506, 509 1.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Deoria pending before the learned C.J.M., Court no. 17, Deoria. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceedings of the Case no. 247 of 2024 (State versus Qadir Ansari @ Saddam Husain), arising out of Case Crime no. 57/2023, under Section 376, 328, 354, 506, 509 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Deoria pending before the learned C.J.M., Court no. 17, Deoria during the pendency of this application before this Hon'ble Court And/Or may be please dto pass such further and suitable order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the fact and circumstances of the case." 4. At the very outset, the learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection by submitting that applicant has rushed to this Court by filing the present application under Section 528 BNSS without availing statutory alternative remedy under Section 227 Cr.P.C./250 BNSS. Court below can deal with the grounds raised in support of this application threadbare at the first instance as it has the advantage of original record. Learned A.G.A. further submits that Court below can easily return findings on the issues as to whether as per the papers accompanying the charge sheet/police report submitted by the Investigating Officer in terms of Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., any offence is made out against applicant or not, whether there is any evidence against applicants and whether the prosecution of applicant can be sustained on account of grave suspicion. On the above premise, the learned A.G.A. submits that no interference is warranted by this Court in present application. 5. It is further submitted by the learned A.G.A. that statements of witnesses examined under Section 161 Cr.P.C., some of whom have also been nominated as prosecution witnesses in the charge sheet/police report dated 02.04.2023 submitted by the Investigating Officer under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. have not been brought on record. Furthermore, there is no categorical averment in the affidavit filed in support of present application regarding the other material collected by Investigating Officer and relied upon to submit the charge sheet/police report. Referring to the judgment of Supreme Court in Kaptan Singh Vs. State of U.P., (2021) 9 SCC 35, the learned A.G.A. submits that in the absence of material collected by the Investigating Officer, leading to the submission of charge sheet, no interference is warranted by this Court in present application. As such, the present application is misconceived and is, therefore, liable to be dismissed. 6. When confronted with above, the learned counsel for applicant proceeded to address the Court on the merits of this application. However, after some arguments, he fairly gave up the prayer made by means of present application. He submits that interest of justice shall be served, in case, liberty is granted to applicants to approach Court below by moving a discharge application in terms of Section 227 Cr.P.C./250 BNSS. 7. Learned A.G.A. representing State-opposite party-1 has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for applicants. 8. Having heard the learned counsel for applicants, the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite party-1 and upon perusal of record, this Court finds that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping this application pending. 9. Accordingly, this application is disposed of finally with a direction to applicant to approach Court below by moving a discharge application in terms of Section 227 Cr.P.C./250 BNSS seeking his discharge in aforementioned criminal case along with a certified copy of this order within a period of two weeks from today. In case, such a discharge application is filed by applicant within aforesaid period, Court below shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order and in the light of the direction contained in the judgment of Supreme Court in Sanjay Kumar Rai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another (2022) 15 SCC 720 within a period of two months thereafter provided there is no other legal impediment. 10. It goes without saying that till the disposal of discharge application as directed above, Court below shall not proceed further against applicant. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 HSM Digitally signed by :- HARI SHANKER MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad