Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38728 (ALL)

SUNDARI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 4 OTHERS

WRIC/10486/2025 · 2025-04-08

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51598-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10486 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sundari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent and Sri Chetan Chatterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 5. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authority in deciding the representation dated February 11, 2025 filed by them. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.4/Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution, Division First, Ballia is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad