p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6719 of 2025 1. Satyanarayan Sahoo 2. Namita Sahoo …. Petitioners Mr. B.K Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K Brahma, ASC Mr. S.C Mekap, Advocate (Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 19.06.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State as well as the Informant. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.236 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Ranpur, arising out of Ranpur P.S. Case No.158 of 2025 for commission of offence punishable under Sections 85/ 296/ 115(2)/ 3(5)/ 88 of BNS Act, 2023, R/w-Section-4 of the D.P. Act. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the omnibus allegations has been made since the p. 2 Petitioners are in-laws. Hence, they may be protected by pre-arrest bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State as well as the Informant oppose the prayer. 5. Taking into account the nature of allegations qua the Petitioners and they being in-law, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper. 6. Before releasing the learned Court shall verify as to whether this order has been assailed before the Apex Court and if so, the result thereof. 7. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 9. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Junior Stenographer