IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NOS: 159.165.185. 186. 194 AND 197 OF 2015 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 159 OF 2015 APHC010730962015 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.805 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND S Subramanyam Achari, S/o. Sekharachari, aged 63 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015(LAASMP 771 OF ?niM Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in L.A.O.P.No.805/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent; None Appeared LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 165 OF 2015 APHC010576292015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.804 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Smt M Achamma, W/o. Chinna. Ramudu, aged 69 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015(LAASMP 782 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in LAOP.No.804/2009 on the file of II Additional Seryor Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 185 OF 2015 APHC010461782015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.801 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated; 22.04.2015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Chakali Moulai, S/o. Ranganna, aged 65 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015fLAA^MP «Q8 OF 2015) Petition under Section 1'51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to of all further proceedings including Execution in LAOP No. grant stay 801/2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 186 OF 2015 r APHC010414742015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.806 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L A), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Boyagani Linganna, S/o. Pedda Bangenna, aged 65 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF AASMP 809 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including Execution in LAOP No. 806/2009 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 1 Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT 194 OF 2015 / APHC010740482015 Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order the file of II Additional Senior Civil and decree passed O.P.No.800 of 2009 on Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated; 22.04.2015. Between: Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. The ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND R/o. Narasimhulu, S/o. Seshanna, aged 60 years Chakali Chinna Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant IA NO: 1 OF 2Q15(LAASMP 828 OF2Q15) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to in LAOP.No. in the affidavit filed in grant stay 800/2009 on the file of 11 District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared of all further proceedings including Execution Additional Senior Civil Judge, nandyal, Kurnool LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nn- 1Q7 OF 2015 APHC010465302015 m Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.803 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. Between: The Special Deputy Collector [L.A.], Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND S Ramanjamma, W/o.Rama Raju, aged 65 years, R/o.Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2015fLAASMP 834 OF 2015) Petition under Section 161 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support pf the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including execution in LAOP No.803/2009 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Rayalu GP for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent: Sri K Rathanga Pani Reddy The Court made the following order: ’-7 1 NJS,J&TRRJ LAAS_159_2015 & batch APHC010742722015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLaDA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 159, 165, 185, 186, 194 and 197 of 2015 LAAS No.159 of 2015 Between: 1. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Tfelugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT AND 1. S.Subramanyam Achari, S/o.Sekharachari, Aged 63 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District.' ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: -None- NJS, J &TRR, J LAAS_159_2015 & batch Court made the following Common Judgment (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) The Heard Mr.T.S.Rayalu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. 22.04.2015 in the L.A.O.P.No.800 2. /!^grieved by a Common Order dated of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, of 2009 & batch on the file of the Court preferred the present batch of appeals. The respondents Nandyal, the State herein are the claimants in L.A.O.P.Nos.SOO, 801, 803, 804, 805 and 806 of 2009. of excavation of Major Disfributory in Block No. 13 of Special Deputy Collector (land Notification dated 28.04.2005 under Section 4 (1) of the as ‘the Act’) for acquisition of land survey numbers of Gopavaram 3. For the purpose Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, the acquisition) issued a Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to of an extent of Ac. 19.14 cents in various Village, Mahanandi Mandal belonging to the respondents / claimants. The Draft Declaration under Section 6 of fhe Acf was published on 26.04.2005. Officer by conducting Award enquiry, Thereafter, the Land Acquisition classified the lands into three categories i.e., (i) rainfed dry lands, (ii) dry lands and (iii) plantain garden lands and fixed the market irrigated with bore water value @ Rs.37,000/-, Rs.46,000/- and Rs.54,000/- per acre respectively. The receiving the compensation under protest respondents / claimants while sought reference under Section 18 of the Act amount of Rs.2,00,000/- 4. Before the Reference Court, they claimed an pport of their case, examined R.Ws.1 and 2 and got marked Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004. On behalf of the per acre and in su Ex.B1-Certified Copy of the 3 NJSj&TRRJ LAAS_1S9_2015 & batch , Referring Officer, no oral evidence was adduced. Copy of the Award No.45/2006-07 dated 21.08.2006 in respect of the lands in question was marked as Ex.AI with consent. The Reference Court, after examining the oral and documentary evidence, enhanced the compensation in respect of Category No.I lands from Rs.37,000/- to Rs.1,14,000/- and Category No.II lands from Rs.46,000/- to 5. Rs.1,35,000/-. Mr.T.S.Rayalau, the learned , Government Pleader, vehemently contends that the enhancement of the compensation by the Reference Court " is without any valid basis. He submits that the respondents / claimants have 6. not adduced any cogent evidence to substantiate their claim for enhancement He argues that Ex.BI-Sale transaction dated of the compensation. 09.02.2004 is in respect of the lands situated in a different village i.e., Gajulapalli, whereas the acquired lands are situated in Gopavaram Village. Further, that a small extent of Ac.0.68 cents was sold and the learned Reference Court went wrong in taking the said transaction into consideration for the purpose of fixing the market value. He also contends that the value appreciation @ 12% p.a., as adopted by the learned Reference Court is not • tenable and at the most 10% value appreciation is reasonable. Making the said submissions, he urges for allowing the appeals. This Court has considered the submissions made and on an appreciation of the same, the point that arises for consideration is : Whether 7. NJS,J&TRR,J LAAS_159_2015 & batch the Common Order under challenge warrants interference by this Court in the facts and circumstances of the case? 8. At the outset, it may be appropriate to mention that hundreds of acres of land situated in different villages of Nandyal District were acquired for the purpose of the Telugu Ganga Project. Most of these villages are contiguous and nature of the land in most of these villages is similar. Be that as it may. 9. As noted earlier, seeking enhancement of the compensation in respect of the subject matter lands, the respondents / claimants got examined R.W.1 (claimant in L.A.O.P.No.800 of 2009) and R.W.2. They relied on Ex.B1 dated 09.02.2004 which is in respect of land situated in the neighbouring Gajulapalli Village.' R.W.1 in his evidence testified that the nature, potentiality and market value of the lands under acquisition are similar to that of Ex.BI land. Nothing was elicited in the cross examination contrary to the said versian. On the other hand, R.W.2, who is an attestor' of Ex.BI in his cross examination, deposed that the value of the lands of Gopavaram, Gajulapalli and Seetharamapuram villages etc., are of the same value. It was further brought on record in the evidence that Gopavaram village is very nearer to Gajulapalli village and the distance between the two villages is 2 Kms., that Gopavaram Village is situated on the main road from Nandyal to Guntur State Highway. Further, that the lands under acquisition are black cotton soil lands and crops like chillies, jowar etc., are being raised. No oral evidence was adduced on behalf of the Referring Officer, but as it is claim for enhancement, the burden the respondents to prove their case, by adducing evidence. The IS on 5 NJS,J&TRR,J LAAS_159_2015 & batch case and no contra evidence was transaction is in respect of another nature of the land, potentiality and the of the subject matter lands can be Government Pleader in this compensation on the basis of the value of the land in the adjoining villages having similar nature and potentiality was approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in G.M., O.N.G.C. Ltd., v. Sendhabhai Vastram Patel & Ors.,^ Insofar as the other contention advanced by the learned evidence brought on record supports their adduced. Therefore, though Ex.B1-Sale village, taking into consideration the distance of 2 Kms., the market value determined and the contention- of the learned regard merits no appreciation. Fixation of 10. Government Pleader that Ex.BI is in respect of a small extent and further that value appreciation of 12% p.a., is not tenable / reasonable, the same deserves no acceptance. More than a half acre was sold vide Ex.BI-Sale Deed dated 09.02.2004 which was about one year two months prior to the issuance of Section 4 (1) Notification in respect of the lands in question. It is not the case Of the appellant-state that the sale transaction was in respect of some house sites or that the same is not genuine. Under the said circumstances, reliance on Ex.BI by the Reference Court cannot be found fault with. That apart, 12% per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in v. Om Prakash (died) by LRs ^ can be taken into value appreciation as Union of India (2005) 6 see 454 AIR 2004 see 4135 6 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS 159 2015 & batch consideration. Therefore, the contentions advanced on behalf of the State are rejected. 11. The learned Reference Court on a proper appreciation of the matter and keeping in view of the difference between the dry lands and the lands having irrigation source under Category 1 and Category 2 respectively as also by assigning cogent reasons was justified in enhancing the compensation. This Court, therefore, is of the opinion that the fixation of compensation in respect of the subject matter lands is just and reasonable and that there are no good grounds warranting interference in the order under challenge. Accordingly, the point is answered. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeals fail and the accordingly dismissed. No costs. Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. 12. same are Consequently, the Miscellaneous Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandyal, Kurnool District, (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri K Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Appeals (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati 5. Two CD Copies SAM sree ^ , HIGH COURT DATED; 10/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREE L.A.A.S. Nos. 159, 165, 185, 186, 194 8c 197 of 2015 I 1tSEP2025 ^ . Current Section m DISMISSING THESE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITS WITHOUT COSTS ■\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT •c THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 185 OF 2015 APHC010461782015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Chakali Moulali, S/o. Ranganna, aged 65 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.801 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015 This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T. S. Rayalu GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and none appeared for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division); Nandyal, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 185 of 2015 Of ANDH^ X 1 r SP 20^5 I ^ Current Section ^ Jr DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS k f~- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 165 OF 2nifi APHC010576292015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Smt M Achamma, W/o. Chinna Ramudu, aged 69 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.804 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T. S. Rayalu GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and none appeared for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandyal, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 165 of 2015 I ttSE? 2025 Current Section DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY Of JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 194 OF 2015 APHC010740482015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Prqect, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Chakali Chinna Narasimhulu, S/o. Seshanna, a^ed 60 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the order and decree passed O.P.No.800 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T. S. Rayalu GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and none appeared for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division): Nandyal, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 194 of 2015 irsEP 7m X m O ^ . Curreni Seciion . ^ PATCjj$i^ DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS .V-' A,v IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ♦ THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 159 OF 2015 APHC010730962015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND S Subramanyam Achari, S/o. Sekharachari, aged 63 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.805 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. This appeal conning on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T S Rayalu GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and none appeared for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandyai, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 159 of 2015 OF I t SEP 2025 ^ Current Section ^ X ;^spatch5^ DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS . V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 197 OF 2015 APHC010465302015 wm Between: The Special Deputy Collector [L.A.], Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND S Ramanjamma, W/o.Rama Raju, aged 65 years, R/o.Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.803 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T. S. Rayalu GP for Appeals for the Appellant, and Sri K Rathanga Pani Reddy for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division): Nandyal, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 197 of 2015 ? yrs^fm I ^ Current section ,* ^ DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I if \ ^ :r? 51 73 PI PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA^ & - V-• ^ ’ A, '■f -k AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 186 OF 2015 APHC010414742015 Between: The Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Telugu Gangh Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Boyagani Linganna, S/o. Pedda Bangenna, aged 65 years, R/o. Gopavaram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act., against the order and decree passed O.P.No.806 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, dated: 22.04.2015. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Mr. T. S. Rayalu GP for \ Appeals for the Appellant, and none appeared for the Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. 2. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR Mr //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division): Nandyal, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. SAM sree S HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 V-* A DECREE L.A.A.S. No. 186 of 2015 X 1 r SE^ 2025 ^ ^ ' Current Secnon ^5 OgSPATCV>S»^ m, eo 9<. DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS