[2025:RJ-JP:51912] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16969/2023 Bajranglal Vaishnav S/o Lt. Shri Mohandas Vaishnav, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Village Badla, Post Akhar, Via Nasirabad, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Provident Fund Building , Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Managing Director, Ajmer Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Ajmer. 3. Manager, Bhagwantpura, Gram Seva Sahakari Saimiti Ltd, Bhawantpura Bank, Branch Nasirabad, Distt. Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Singhal Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and the respondents may kindly be directed to pay/refund the amount of PF (Rs. 412,481/-) deposited by the petitioner immediately withinterest or the respondents may kindly be directed to decided the complaint dated 28.03.2023 (Annex-3) of the petitioner with reasoned and speaking order keeping his right [2025:RJ-JP:51912] (2 of 2) [CW-16969/2023] reserve to in case of avail further remedy rejection of his such complaint dated 28.03.2023 or the claim of demanding his deposited PF amount.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /115