Namburi Vijaya Narayana Raju v. Smt. Namburi Satya Lakshmi,
SA/134/2016 · 2025-02-07
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38721 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38721 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV, FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA SECOND APPEAL NO: 134 OF 2016 Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC against the order dated against the decree and Judgment dated 30.09.2015 passed in AS No. 10 of 2012 on the file court of the II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam the Decree and Judgment, dated 20.09.2011 passed in OS No. 1744/2005 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. Between: RAO reversing Namburi Vijaya Narayana Raju, S/o. Late Raghunadha Raju aged about 55 years, R/o. D.No.43-8-1, G-1, Sri Durga Towers, Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam. Hindu ...Appellant/Respondent/Defendant AND
1. Smt. Namburi Satya Lakshmi, W/o Late Venkatapathi Kumar Raju Hindu, aged about 49 Lalithanagar, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Namburi Amulaya, D/o. Late Venkatapathi Kumar Raju about 26 years, R/o. Door No.49-5-3 Visakhapatnam 16. years, R/o. Door No.49-5-3, Sri Vykunt, Hindu, aged Sri Vykunt, Lalithnagar,
3. Nambrui Nandini, D/o. Late Venkatapathi Kumar Raju, Hindu, aged R/o. Door No.49-5-3, Sri Vykunt, Lalithnagar, about 22 years Visakhapatnam 16. ...Respondents/Appellants/Plaintiff Counsel for the Appellants : SRI. RAYAPROLU SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. J. SURESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. K. MAHIPATHI RAO The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLIE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.l34 of 2016
JUDGMENT: Today when the matter is listed under the caption 'for withdrawal', learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he
1. filed a Memo dated 23-01-2025, before the Registry for withdrawing the second appeal and the same is placed on record. The representation made by the learne^d counsel for the appellant is recorded. 2,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present matter. 3 Permission is granted. 4, Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,
1. The II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. (with records)
2. The I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam
3. One CC to Sri Rayaprolu Srikanth, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri J. Suresh Babu, Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to Sri K. Mahipathi Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
6. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
7. Three CD Copies psr sree
•- Is HIGH COURT DATED:07/02/2025
JUDGMENT SA.No.134 of 2016 I 0 3 MAR 2025 3 Current Section DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS