2025:UHC:5548-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/5/2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Devang Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent no. 2 & 3. 4. Petitioner appeared in preliminary examination of Combined State Civil Service / Upper Subordinate Service Examination-2012. Since, he was declared unsuccessful and was not called for mains examination, therefore, he filed this writ petition in the year 2016, seeking the following reliefs: “(a) Issue, Writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to include the name of petitioner in the select list prepared for main examination after the preliminary examination of Combined State Civil Services/Upper Subordinate Service Examination- 2012 (b) Issue, Writ, Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to permit the petitioner to appear in the main examination scheduled to be held in between 31-01- 2016 to 03-02-2016 of Combined State Civil Services/Upper Subordinate Service Examination – 2012” 2025:UHC:5548-DB 5. By an interim order dated 08.01.2016, Coordinate Bench permitted the petitioner to appear in the mains examination. 6. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Public Service Commission submits that pursuant to the interim order passed by Coordinate Bench, petitioner was permitted to appear in the mains examination, however, he could not qualify the Hindi examination, which is compulsory for every candidate to qualify. Thus, he submits that no relief can be granted to the petitioner since he could not clear the Hindi paper in the mains examination. 7. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the Commission, we do not find any reason to interfere in the matter. 8. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Subhash Upadhyay, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 01.07.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f 487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819 DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5 , cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.07.02 10:00:09 +05'30' 2025:UHC:5548-DB