VIJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/15524/2025 · 2025-11-06
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38714 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38714 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15524 of 2025
Decided on: 06.11.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vijay Kumar and Ors
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Even though the respondents have not filed, reply, however, with consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage.
2.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the writ petition, seeking applicability of Sanjay Kumar Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2
have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWPOA No.5536 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 01.11.2023.
2 in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Sanjay Kumar2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 6, 2025
Judge R.Atal