Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38707 (AP)

Sri Kodanda Rama Rice & Oil Mill, v. The Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution

WP/28729/2013 · 2025-06-29

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010753732013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28729/2013 Between: 1. SRI KODANDA RAMA RICE & OIL MILL,, NAGUR VILLAGE (SC-211), GARUGUMILLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, B.GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O.SEETHARAMA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION, CORPORATION LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, NEW BUILDING, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013 2. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATIONS, APEPDCL, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 3. ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ERO, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the proceedings notice Lr.No. AAO/ERO/PVP/JAO/ BS/D.No.706/10 dated 19-08-2010 issued by the 3rd respondent herein as confirmed in C.G.No.179/2010-11 Dt.25-01-2011 of the lst respondent forum as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act and rules made there under and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 4029 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders, passed on dated 04-10-2013 In W.P.MP.No. 35669 of 2013 W.P.No. 28729 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 35669 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disconnect the power supply pertaining to the petitioner service No.150209000211 (old service No.211) pursuant to the notice Lr.No. AAO/ERO/PVP/JA0/ BS/D.No.706/10 dated 19-08-2010 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOPPULA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 26.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.06.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28729/2013 Date: 30.06.2025 KA