2025:UHC:1884 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 19th MARCH, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.266 of 2025 Krishana Singh ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mrs. Shivangi Gangwar, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A., assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail under Sections 147, 148, 186, 353, 307, 504, 506 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in FIR No. 307 of 2020, registered at Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. According to the First Information Report dated 11.11.2020, the police party reached the house of Malkeet Singh on 10.11.2020 to arrest him. He was 2025:UHC:1884 2 an accused for the offence under Section 363 and Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in FIR No. 219 of 2020. The present applicant and the other four co-accused fired on the police party at around 23.25 hrs. to aid Malkeet Singh to escape from the spot. The present applicant and all the co-accused managed to escape from the spot. The police party had identified them. 3. Heard Mrs. Shivangi Gangwar, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A., assisted by Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the respondent. 4. Mrs. Shivangi Gangwar, Advocate, contended that the applicant was not present on the spot. He has been falsely implicated in the present matter. The co- accused Smt. Cheelo Kaur was granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 241 of 2025 and other co-accused have been granted regular bail. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. 5. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A., has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the 2025:UHC:1884 3 Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Krishana Singh, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicant shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (iii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case. (iv) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court. 2025:UHC:1884 4 8. It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:19.03.2025 Shiv/