Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38698 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. JAIPAL @ JP S/O SHRI KHEMA RAM

CRLBC/57/2024 · 2025-10-14

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 57/2024 State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Petitioner Versus Jaipal @ Jp S/o Shri Khema Ram, R/o Sheelgaon, Police Station Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta with Ms. Sweta Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 14/10/2025 1. Present bail cancellation application is filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. by the applicant/State seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused-respondent vide order dated 31.10.2018 in connection with FIR No. 164/2015 registered at Police Station Mundawar District Alwar for the offences under Section 147, 323, 341, 302 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that present bail cancellation application is filed in compliance of the order dated 31.10.2018. Relevant portion of the same, is reproduced as under:- "3. भविष्य में प्रार्थी अगर विसी अन्य आपरावि प्ररण में विप्त पाया जाता है तो विचारण न्यायाय इस न्यायाय े अन्य विसी आदेश े वि#ना प्रार्थी ी जमानत विनरस्त रने े विए स्वतंत्र रहेगा।" 3. Further, it is submitted that factual report dated 16.06.2025 has reflected that an offence was committed by the respondent, [2025:RJ-JP:41989] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-57/2024] wherein charge-sheet dated 28.12.2022 is filed under the provisions of Arms Act. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-respondent has opposed the prayer of the applicant. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering that as per the factual report, it is reflected that an offence is committed by the accused- respondent, therefore, looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to allow the present bail cancellation application. 7. Accordingly, the present bail cancellation application is allowed. Thus, order dated 31.10.2018 is hereby quashed and set aside and benefit of bail extended to the respondent vide order dated 31.10.2018 ceases to operate, henceforth. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/311