JITENDRA SINGH @ BAJRANGI JI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/1525/2025 · 2025-12-12
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38696 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38696 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37350-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1525 of 2025
Jitendra Singh @ Bajrangi Ji, aged about 24 years, son of Dasrath Singh, resident of Semariya Tand, P.O. and P.S. – Latehar, District – Latehar (Jharkhand).
….. Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
….. Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State
: Mrs. Shweta Singh, A.P.P.
---------
Order No. 02/Dated: 12th December, 2025
I.A. No. 16294 of 2025
1. Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condonation of delay of 07 days in preferring the appeal.
3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 07 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
4. I.A. No. 16294 of 2025 stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1525 of 2025
5. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Latehar in Misc. Criminal Application No. 679 of 2025, arising out of Latehar P.S. Case No. 218/2020, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
6. There was an encounter between the extremists and the police personnel and after the extremists fled away, on search of the place,
2025:JHHC:37350-DB
2
huge quantity of arms and ammunitions and other incriminating articles were recovered.
7. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is in custody since 31.01.2025. It has been submitted that several of the co-accused persons have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
8. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that the appellant has got criminal antecedent.
9. Regard being had to the fact that the case of appellant seems to be similarly situated to that of co-accused person, who have been granted bail, as stated above, we, while setting aside the order dated 07.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Latehar in Misc. Criminal Application No. 679 of 2025, arising out of Latehar P.S. Case No. 218/2020, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 218/2020 (S.T. No. 85 of 2025).
10. This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
December 12, 2025 Sunil/ Uploaded On : 16.12.2025