APHC010749612014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION Between: Kum. Mutyala Chittemma The Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF 2. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on last occasion i.e., 22.08.2024 posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner i interest in prosecuting the matter. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9749/2014 ...PETITIONER AND The Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 22.08.2024. Therefore, on 28.08.2024 the matter was under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3329] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 28.08.2024 the matter was under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, also there is no representation on s not evincing any 2 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.01.2025 KKV 3 226 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.9749 of 2014 Dated:23.01.2025 KKV