Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38692 (AP)

Dr. K. Nagamani v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/36326/2018 · 2025-04-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010754092018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36326/2018 Between: Dr. K. Nagamani ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .. to issue direction order or Writ more suitably WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in implementing the 8th Executive Council meeting held on 12.03.2018 where in the E C ratified for the payment of Rs.35,000/- as salary to the Assistant Professors vide item No.7(RA-3) selectively to only one Assistant Professor R3 in Computer Science Department and denying the payment of same salary to the petitioner is arbitrary, irrational, illegal and violation of the Principle of equal work equal pay and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to pay a salary of Rs.35,000/- p.m. on par with Respondent No.3 and pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner from the date on which third Respondent is paid Rs.35,000/-p.m.” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 2 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 36326 of 2018 21.04.2025 Mjl /*