PROFESSOR DEENANATH PANDEY MAHAVIDYALAYA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/24296/2023 · 2025-03-23
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:43111 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24296 of 2023 Petitioner :- Professor Deenanath Pandey Mahavidyalaya And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohit Pandey Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives in the writ petition and same has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. This order has been passed in the presence of Ms. Shambhavi Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad