Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38688 (AP)

The Zonal Manager, Food Corpt. of India, v. Donnala Appa Rao,

WA/413/2016 · 2025-02-04

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COUf?T OF ANDHRA TUESDAY, THE FOURTH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT PRADESH AA/IARAVAT1^^<^^^ f- DAY OF FEBRUARY O 11 I o T7 0^ JUSTICE, SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR~ the honourable the chief AND the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 41.? of Writ Appeal under clause , ^ the Letters Patent filed ated 23-10-2013 in W.P.No.25801 of 2001 Between: against order on the file of the High Court. The Zonal Manager, Food Maddows, Chennai-600 006 Corporation of India Zonal Office, No.3 -APPELLANT (RESPONDENT) AND Dannala Ramulu, Assistant Manager of India, r/o Kakinada, E.G. District. Donnala Appa Rao, S/o late Sri (Depot), Food Corporation ...RESPONDENT (PETITIONER) LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WAMP NO: 1083 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances may be in WP.No.25801 of 2001 mam Writ Appeal, in the interest of justice. stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to in support of the petition, the High Court suspend the order dt.23.10.2013 i pending disposal of the Counsel for the Appellant; Counsel for the Respondent: -- The Court made the following; JUDGMENT SRI B. G. RAVINDER REDDY Bench Sr.No;-5 [3483] APHC010756232016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI . SBE 0^ r • WRIT APPEAL NO: 413 of 2016 The Zonal Manager, Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office, No.3, Maddows, Chennai-600 006. ...Appellant Vs. ...Respondent Donnala Appa Rao ********** NONE Advocate for Appellant Advocate for Respondent CORAM -.THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : February, 2025 P C ; None for the appellant. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR “Section officer //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri B. G. Ravinder Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Three CD Copies ssb r high court DATED:04/02/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.413 of 2016 I 1 FEB 2025 7XO 60 . Current Section ^ dismissing the W.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS