APHC010755372013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI i r o .'Vr Of FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE V :.. AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 232 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dt. 15.2.2013 in WP.No. 6347 of 2013 Between: S. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Bayya Reddy @ Peddabba, aged about 43 years, Occ: Advocate, now working as Additional Public Prosecutor, Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Punganur, Chittoor District ...Petitioner AND 1. P. N. S. Prakash, S/o. Sri P. Dakshina Murthy, aged about 43 Advocate, R/o. Punganur Town & Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. The Secretary to Government of A..,P Legislative Affairs, Justice Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Director of Prosecutions, A.P., Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Chittoor District. 5. The District Sessions Judge, Chittoor District. 6. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District. Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. years. , Law ...Respondents/Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2013rWAMP 554 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated • in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Suspend the operation of the order dt. 15.2.2013 i appeal. M OF 2013(wamp pp 201^^ in WP.No. 6347 of 2012, pen^g disposal of the above writ lA Between: P- N. S. Prakash Advocate. R/o. Punganur Town S/o. Sri P. Dakshina Murthy, aged about & Mandal, Chittoor District. 43 years. ...Petitioner/1®* Respondent/1 AND St Respondent 1- S. Bhaskar Reddy. S/o. years. Occ; Advocate, Assistant Sessions Judge Bayya Reddy @ Peddabba, now working as Additional Public ■s Court, Punganur, Chittoor District. aged about 43 Prosecutor, ...Respondents/Petitioner/Petitioner of A..,P Legislative Affairs Department. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Director of Prosecutions 2. The Secretary to Government Justice, Law A.P., Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector. Chittoor District. 5. The District Sessions Judge, 6. The Superintendent of Police Chittoor District. . Chittoor District. Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ■■■Respondents/Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court vacate the interim order dated 20-02-2013 i No. 232 of 2013 praying that in the circumstances may be pleased to m WAMP No. 554 of 2013 in WA respondent herein in the interest stated granted in favour of the 1st of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mrs Y.MAHALAKSHMI, representing SRI K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 5; --- Counsel for the Respondent No.6: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: APHC010755372013 Bench Sr.No:-10 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 232 of 2013 ...Appellant S. Bhaskar Reddy Vs. ...Respondents P N S Prakash and others itititieicifk-kicic Mrs. Y. Mahalakshmi representing Mr. K Ramamohan Advocate for Appellant GP for Home for R.6 Advocate(s) for Respondent CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 4**’ July, 2025 PC: Mrs. Y. Mahalakshmi, learned counsel representing Mr. K Ramamohan, learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter is rendered infructuous. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri K Ramamohan, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUTp 3. Two CD Copies vna r ,1^ HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WANO. 232 OF 2013 ^ ^ 15 JUL 2025 m ■W a> Current tieciion ^ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS