SUNIL KUMAR Versus AMARJEET SINGH CMP-27355 of 2025 in COPC-808 of 2025 11.12.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/respondents-State. Compliance affidavit, which is not on record, filed at the behest of non-applicants/respondents reveals that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, pay of the petitioner has been refixed vide office order dated 03.11.2025 subject to outcome of Review Petition in case CWP No.6443 of 2021, titled as Babu Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. However, respondents are directed to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, are paid to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within two months from today. December 11, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge