Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010759512018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36918/2018 Between: M. B. Maheshwari ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B V APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36918 of 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 6th respondent in not considering and disposing the petitioners representation dated 12.03.2018 and 07.08.2018 for transfer as Anganwadi Worker from Anganwadi Centre, Puchakayalapalli Village, Uyyalawada Mandal, Kurnool District to Anganwadi Centre, Main Bazar, Jammalamadugu Town, YSR Kadapa District in accordance with the Memo issued by the 5th respondent vide Memo No. /A3/2018 dated 12.03.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith consider the case of petitioner for transfer and to pass…”
2. Heard Ms. B.V.Aparna Lakshmi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare for the respondents.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a request to transfer her from Anganwadi Centre, Puchakayalapalli Village, Uyyalawada Mandal, Kurnool District to Anganwadi Centre, Main Bazaar, Jammalamadugu Town, YSR Kadapa District as Anganwadi Worker.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the request for the transfer cannot be done since the appointment of the Anganwadi Worker itself is meant for a particular village, being a native of that particular place.
3
5. In the light of submissions made, this Court does not find force in the
contentions of the petitioner, as rightly put by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, as per the Government Orders, the Anganwadi Worker shall be appointed considering the fact that individual belongs to that particular area. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to Costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 16.04.2025 UPS
4
34 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.36918 of 2018
Dated.16.04.2025
UPS