Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38681 (AP)

K.E.Venkatesulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal Secretary

WP/43745/2016 · 2025-10-09

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010757982016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43745/2016 Between: K.E.Venkatesulu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) 2. GANDRALA RATHNA KUMAR SC For APSCCFC LTD The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not absorbing the petitioner in the sanctioned post of driver in the 2nd respondent society though 2 he is entitled and qualified to hold the said post and making efforts to absorb the unqualified person in the said post as illegal, arbitrary exercise of power and unjust and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to absorb the petitioner in the said vacant sanctioned post as driver and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case....” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Ch.Mounica, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner on record and Sri Gandrala Ratna Kumar, learned standing counsel for the respondent would jointly submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 10.10.2025. Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.43745 of 2016 10.10.2025 Asr