Partap Saini Vs. Prem Lata & Ors. CMP(M) No. 2089/2024 12.11.2025 Present: Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Respondent No. 1 ex parte. Ms. Ranjana Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. None for respondent No. 4. Mr. T.R. Jain, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. CMP(M) No. 2089/2024 Notice issued to respondent No. 4 has been received back duly served, however, there is no representation on his behalf, hence, he is proceeded against ex parte. Reply to the application has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 6, wherein, prayer for dismissal of the application has been made. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 257 days that has occurred in filing the present appeal. ...2... Consequently, the present application is allowed and delay of 257 days that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. /2025 Appeal be registered. Notice. Ms. Ranjana Chauhan, Mr. T.R. Jain and Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocates, accept service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 2 & 3, respondent No. 5 and respondent No. 6, respectively. Let notice be issued to respondents No. 1 & 4 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within two days. List on 12.12.2025. In the meantime, records of learned Tribunal below be also called for. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 12th November, 2025 (raman)