Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38679 (ALL)

POONAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

CRLR/1341/2024 · 2025-09-09

Harvir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1341 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 and perused the material on record. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that respective accused persons belong to the OBC/General Category and they do not belong to the SC/ST Category. Learned counsel for the revisionist has further submitted that on this ground alone order dated 25.01.2024 has been passed wherein compliant/application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been rejected. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 did not dispute the fact that the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 belong to the OBC or General Category but not to SC/ST Category. 4. Without going into any other controversy, the order dated 25.01.2024 is set aside and the concerned Special Judge, (SC/ST Act) is directed to reconsider the same and pass the order afresh. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present revision is disposed of. September 10, 2025 Vikram Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Pravesh Kumar Tripathi, Vijendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Tarkeshwar Mishra (Harvir Singh,J.) Poonam Devi .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad