SAWAR SINGH RAWAT SON OF SHRI RAYMAL SINGH RAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3757/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38672 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38672 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27081] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3757/2025 Sawar Singh Rawat Son Of Shri Raymal Singh Rawat, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Near Tolol Tax, Chainpura, Bhawanikhera, Nasirabad , Ajmer , District Ajmer ( Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Ramswaroop, Sub- Inspector Of Police, Police Station Christianganj, Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 21/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that impugned FIR was registered by the police authorities, who were biased and prejudiced towards the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has prayed for fair investigation in the instant matter as investigating agency and complainant are the same person. Per contra, learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner has concealed the fact qua petitioners' criminal antecedents and fact qua cancellation of anticipatory bail application vide order dated 19.09.2024 is also not apprised. List of criminal antecedents as reflected in the factual report are reproduced as under:-
[2025:RJ-JP:27081] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3757/2025]
“
अतः पकरण हाजा की सेट्स ररपोटर /
तथातक ररपोटर अवलोकनारर शीमान की सेवामे
पेश है
पूरर आपराधधक ररकारर अधभयुक सांरर धसंह रारत क.सं .
पकरण संखा मय
कायमी ददनांक धारा पुदलस राना दजला नतीजा दववरण
1. 314/2019 ददनांक 24.08.2019 420,406, 120 बी भादसं सदवना उदयपुर
चाजरशीट 44 ए/2021 ददनांक 28.08.21 पैणणंग कोटर
2. 17/2021 ददनांक
22.01. 2021 420,120
बी भादसं दसदवल लाईन अजमेर चाजरशीट 399/21 ददनांक 19.12.21 पैणणंग ” कोटर Further, it is submitted that petitioner has committed crime by trapping individuals in guise of disbursing loan to them at a nominal rate. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present matter. Howsoever, in the interest of justice, this Courts directs that investigation in the instant matter be conducted under the supervision of the Superintendent of Police, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /47