1 2025:CGHC:2936 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4921 of 2024 1 - Noman D/o Krishna Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Baroda Khurd Post- Daihandih, District- Kabirdham ( C.G.). Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal (Cgvyapam) Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G.). 2 - Exam Controller Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal, Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, ( C.G.). Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suraj Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate on behalf of Dr. Sourabh Pande, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a directions towards the respondent authority to correct the name of the petitioner as “Noman” instead of “Noman Krishna” in the TET application form and TET result 2024 & the date of birth of the RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.17 18:44:39 +0530 2 petitioner as “13/08/1997” instead of “13/08/1987” in the TET result on the basis of 10th class mark-sheet. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2024 was conducted by the respondent and the petitioner submitted the OnLine form for the same. The Mark- sheet was also issued in which the petitioner was found successfully eligible. He submits that in the TET mark-sheet, inadvertently her date of birth has wrongly been shown as 13/08/1987 instead of 13/08/1997, whereas her name has been shown as “Noman Krishna” instead of “Noman”. This petition has been filed without any delay and as soon as the petitioner realized the mistake has approached this Court and also made representation to the respondent. He further submits that if the correction is not made, it would cause prejudice to the petitioner as her date of birth and name have been wrongly reflected in the TET mark-sheet and by making a correction in the mark-sheet, is not going to cause any loss or prejudice to the respondent and it will not make any change in the result of the petitioner. Therefore, the relief as claimed may be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner move a fresh representation seeking necessary correction as stated in the writ petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within 50 days. 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of 3 with a direction to the respondent authority that, if any representation along with the documentary proof in support of her claim is filed by the petitioner for correction of the date of birth and name in the TET +mark-sheet, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of 50 days in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul