Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38672 (BOM)

SAGAR SHAMRAO JADHAV AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/895/2024 · 2025-03-11

Shri S M Modak, Shri Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 19-WP-895-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.895 OF 2024 Sagar Shamrao Jadhav & Anr. .... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Anand S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. • Smt. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH, 2025 P.C. : 1. After arguing for some time, when we expressed our disinclination to grant relief in this Petition, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks unconditional withdrawal of this Petition with liberty to file an application for discharge before the Trial Court. 2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally. The Petitioners are at liberty to prefer an application for discharge before the Trial Court. If such Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2025.03.13 14:54:15 +0530 2 / 2 19-WP-895-24.odt an application is preferred, it shall be decided on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being influenced by withdrawal of this Petition. 3. The Petition is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)