Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38671 (KAR)

SRI. RANGASWAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/2577/2025 · 2025-08-21

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32643 CRL.P No. 2577 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RANGASWAMAIAH S/O GUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, DUSTING OFFICER APMC YARD, BANGARPET TOWN, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR-563114, AND R/AT NO.91, BENGANURU, BANGARPETE, KOLAR-563114. 2. SRI. ASHOK G.V., S/O K.VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, IN CHARGE MANAGER, APMC YARD, BANGARPET TOWN, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR-563114, AND R/AT NO.83, 9TH CROSS, SHREE NAGAR LAYOUT, BANGARPET, KOLAR-563114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NANJUNDA GOWDA M. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY BANGARPET POLICE STATION, KOLAR, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32643 CRL.P No. 2577 of 2025 2. SMT.SARASAMMA W/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT GATTAMADAMANGALA VILLAGE, K.G.F TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563113. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. T.S. MANOHARA, ADV. FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., (FILED U/S 528 OF BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CRIME NO.340/2024 OF BANGARPET POLICE WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT, K.G.F. FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 106 OF BNS, 2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: [ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32643 CRL.P No. 2577 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed assailing the registration of crime in Cr. No. 340/2024 of Bangarpet Police Station. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. He submits that the Investigating Officer has since filed the charge sheet and, therefore, seeks liberty to challenge the charge sheet separately. 3. The memo is taken on record. 4. In view of the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet, as prayed for. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE MCR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42