1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.422 of 2011 Dated 11.02.2025 APHC010755812011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.1of 2025 In/& CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 422/2011 Between: 1. P.Ganesh Babu, S/o. Venkateswar Rao, Prop. M/s. Sudha Aqua Feeds & Needs, Ganapavaram, W.G.Dist. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of A.P, Represented by Its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. M/s Number Laboratories, Rep. by Its Managing Partner N. Mohan Rao ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Syed Ghouse Basha Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T. C. Krishnan 2. Public Prosecutor (A.P) The Court made the following: 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.422 of 2011 Dated 11.02.2025 COMMON ORDER: I.A.No.1 of 2025 is filed to record the compromise affected between the parties and pass appropriate orders. 2. This application is appended with a memo issued by the 2nd respondent that he had received an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Only) from the petitioner toward full and final settlement of the crpiminal revision case. This application is also accompanied with the affidavit which says that the matter is settled out of the court at the behest of the elders and urged to pass necessary orders. The application is also accompanied with the joint memo signed by the counsels for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and also the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. Hence, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed and the compromise is recorded. 3. In view of the compromise entered in between the parties and the cheque amount has already been paid by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent and the parties have settled their scores before the elders at the behest of the counsels for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised by compounding the offence. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore in C.C.No.1209 of 2005, dated 13.08.2008, as confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.102 of 2008, dated 08.02.2011, by the learned III Additional District & 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.422 of 2011 Dated 11.02.2025 Sessions Judge (FTC), Nellore is set aside, as a result, the revisionist is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 11.02.2025 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.422 of 2011 Dated 11.02.2025 190 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 422/2011 11.02.2024 KMS