Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38663 (RAJ)

NIJAMDEEN S/O SHRI HURMAT KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13993/2025 · 2025-12-10

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50288] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13993/2025 Nijamdeen S/o Shri Hurmat Khan, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Rayana, Tehsil Tapukada, District Khairthal, Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak, Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Khairthal, Tijara. 3. The Medical Officer Incharge And Officio Secretary, Medicare Relief Society, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 4. Principal Medical Officer Sub District Hospital, Tijara, Dist.- Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. Mohd. Kasim Khan and Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025 1. Instant civil writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with following prayer:- “1. The respondents may be directed to be released the due salary of the humble petitioner for the period from 01.04.2024 till date with interest @ 9 p.a. 2. The respondents may also be directed to release minimum of regular pay scale to the humble petitioner of the post of Ward Boy which is a cadre post in the Medical and Health Department and accordingly appropriate directions may be issued [2025:RJ-JP:50288] (2 of 2) [CW-13993/2025] for release of the minimum of the regular pay scale, in the interest of justice. 3. Any other appropriate order or direction as deemed fit may be passed in favour of the humble petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2. Pursuant to order dated 12.11.2025, the respondents have released payment to the petitioner but the grievance of the petitioner is that after release of payment, the services of petitioner were discontinued orally, without any written order. He further submits that as per contract executed by the respondents, the term of petitioner on contractual post is up to 31.03.2026. He submits that a liberty be granted to him to raise and file a fresh petition on subsequent cause of action accrued to the petitioner in wake of discontinuation from service on verbal order and with the aforesaid, the writ petition may be disposed of. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/376