BHOLA RAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY DEPTT OF REVENUE REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORMS
WPC/354/2023 · 2025-07-30
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3866 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3866 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:21027
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 354 of 2023
Bhola Ram
….. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Ranchi
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau
3. The Superintendent of Police, Palamau
4. The Additional Collector, Palamau
5. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Palamau
6. The Circle Officer, Hariharganj, Palamau
7. The Officer-in-Charge, Hariharganj P.S, Palamau
8. Arvind Ram
9. Sudish Ram
10. Prayag Ram
….. Respondents
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohit Roy
Mr. Vibhor Mayank For the State:
Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, A.C to G.P-II
-----
07/30.07.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the allotment of Indira Awas in favour of the respondent Nos. 8 to 10 over the land appertaining to Khata No. 01, Plot No. 188, Village-Sultani, P.S-Hariharganj, District-Palamau, measuring an area of 21 Decimals.
2. Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, learned A.C to G.P-II appearing on behalf of the respondent-State, submits that the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner can be looked into by the competent authority i.e. the respondent No.2. Hence, if the petitioner prefers a fresh representation in this regard before the respondent No.2, the same will be appropriately considered.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the prayer made in the present writ petition, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to prefer a fresh representation on the present issue before the respondent No.2. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent No.2, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondent Nos. 8 to 10, shall take an
2025:JHHC:21027 appropriate informed decision in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of filing of the said representation.
4. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and direction.
5. Consequently, I.A. No. 1242/2024 also stands disposed of.
Satish/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)